I'm a Floridian web engineer who planted his roots in Paris. Some of my favorite past-times are analyzing and optimizing development processes, building solid APIs, mentoring junior devs, and long walks on the beach.

Dot-Rspec files

I was recently working on a small library for assigning people a schedule and I decided to go with rspec 2 for testing. As I was working with it, I found that you can use a .rspec file to keep all of the settings in which seemed like a good idea to me. I'm used to having config files like that what with .bashrc, .rvmrc, etc. My file was laid out as such:

--format documentation

I could then run the command rspec spec/libs/* and it would run all of my tests in the desired format. I didn't want to have to specify the directory every time and so I decided to add the -I option in my .rspec file to include the directory. This, for some reason, would not work and while looking for a solution, I found the rspec 1 to 2 upgrade page with my answer.

Create a Rake Task

Under rake task it lists how you can set the options using a Rakefile, which in retrospec(...har), I should have been using anyways. I ended up using something like the following:

require 'rspec/core/rake_task'
RSpec::Core::RakeTask.new do |t|
    t.rspec_opts = ["--color", "--format documentation", "--fail-fast"]
    t.pattern = ['spec/libs/*.rb']

Now I can call my tests with rake spec.

Moral of the Story

Don't use .rspec for your rspec configurations. You'll probably end up needing a Rakefile at some point anyways so you might as well use that.